16:32:22 #startmeeting 16:32:31 #meetingtopic IRC Support SIG 16:32:58 * Sonar_Guy is present 16:33:05 #topic Init process. 16:33:17 16:33:21 * EvilBob 16:34:19 * nirik will wait a few more minutes for folks to wander in. 16:34:21 * zcat 16:35:55 ok, I guess we can go ahead and get started... 16:36:16 #topic Weekly stats 16:36:29 as always they are at: http://theglaserfamily.org/ircstats/fedora-weekly.html 16:37:08 one interesting thing I'd like to bring up: So we have some people who are in the top 25 that are new... what could we do to try and get those folks more involved in helping others? 16:37:19 candy? 16:37:39 I know some of them are just needing lots of help themselves... but can we bring them into helping others in some way? 16:37:49 nirik, some are trying 16:38:01 hiemanshu for one 16:38:16 * vwbusguy- apologizes for naming nicks 16:38:38 anyhow, lets try and see if we can't bring some of those folks into helping out more. Just something to keep in mind. 16:39:12 anyone have anything they would like to bring up related to stats? 16:39:36 The channel number has stayed pretty high since release... 16:40:18 * Southern_Gentlem 16:40:39 it will for another week 16:40:39 ok, moving along then... 16:40:56 at least. I am sure we picked up some idlers... 16:41:21 LOL 16:41:22 #topic catalysts 16:41:36 I would like to point all the helpers/ops at http://freenode.net/catalysts.shtml 16:41:57 I think it's a good read and we should keep some of the things it mentions in mind. 16:42:33 so, if folks could set aside a few minutes and read through that, that would be great. 16:42:56 #topic fedora-social 16:43:23 So, with us pointing the off topic stuff over to #fedora-social there are more cases of people being jerks/ranting/disruptive in there. 16:43:45 Should we have some policy there? Or just leave it as a free for all unless someone complains? 16:43:58 We need a few chan specific ops in there I think 16:44:19 well, if we need to kick the occasional person, we could also just op fedbot, who is in there. 16:44:42 but it's unclear to me under what conditions someone should be removed. :) 16:45:19 * JukeBoxHero too 16:45:22 they see me coming and shut up 16:45:26 a couple people that are not always active in #fedora, having to wait for an op to join -social, figure out what is happening, figure out if they feel like doing something. 16:45:27 nirik: the rule of thumb I use is that if people are complaining, and are not part of the rant its time for somebody to have a timeout 16:45:30 well yes, but I think we got EvilBob 16:45:46 JukeBoxHero: what do you mean? 16:45:49 he cant surely put people (jerks) in their place :) 16:45:53 can* 16:46:11 JukeBoxHero: Sure we police the channels in "non-op" ways 16:46:22 JukeBoxHero: I am not an op in either channnel 16:46:31 Sonar_Guy: ok, but thats kinda mob rule. ;) What if a few jerks complain about someone else. 16:46:38 JukeBoxHero: that is what the link nirik pointed to is about 16:47:07 nirik, well you have to weigh who is complaining 16:47:14 Personally I would like it to be all hands off, but a few people do dissapoint and seem to make it needed to clean it up every once in a while. 16:47:23 Again, I am willing to be an op in either channel but would like to be able to work through fedbot and not be in the access lists 16:47:26 nirik: as of yet that has not happened, most of the time alot of us are on both channels 16:47:55 (oh, 'catalyist' as in being anti-trollish on freenode. when i saw that link a few times earlier, i mentally ignored it out because i associated it with ATI.) 16:47:56 so we know who is not nice and who is usually ok 16:48:16 nirik, register bob for fedbot and op fedbot in social 16:48:21 a lot of times in social it is petty personal attacks, a simple kick "be nice" is enough 16:48:24 *catalyst even 16:48:55 a long ban list is not needed in -social for sure 16:49:20 it's sad there can't be any place thats 100% open/say what you like. ;( 16:49:23 i don't need/want ops in #fedora-social, since my tolerance for shit is too high there. 16:49:36 lol 16:49:56 zcat: yeah it has a way different set of rules and a much higher bar 16:50:01 tentatively, from personal experience, the incremental change of a new user would be ask help in #fedora, become comfortable with the distro, help back in return as he gets the know-hows, then eventually move into #fedora-social 16:50:06 hey guys, when you are at the end of the meeting, give me a few mins if possible . I just need to discuss something quick 16:50:07 zcat: and it is working 16:50:14 that must say something about #fedora-social 16:50:19 mether: no problem, we have open floor at the end. 16:51:01 EvilBob, anyone is still free to change the topic there, too, and that hasn't been a problem :) 16:51:12 The main rule we have pushed in social is no technical support 16:51:19 * nirik is ok with trying the op fedbot, give a few folks access to it that are in social and hope it's not needed. 16:51:24 Yeah we have fun with the topic 16:51:52 i love #fedora-social, sometimes i think i can get away with murder there ;) 16:51:55 it is a fun channel most of the time 16:52:01 due to a bug in the flood protect plugin currently, it may mean that fedbot kicks people who flood there (until I track it down and fix it) 16:52:24 nirik, will op'ing fedbot in #Fedora-social mean anyone with fedbot access generally will be ops in Fedora-social 16:52:28 yeh murder is not exactly social, try -antisocial for that 16:52:38 nirik, essentially will this make #Fedora ops #Fedora-social-ops ? 16:52:50 vwbusguy-: it can be seperate... 16:53:12 EvilBob: is -antisocial a really serious channel? 16:53:18 i thought it was just for kics 16:53:19 JukeBoxHero: yup 16:53:21 kicks* 16:53:59 yeah, it's seperate. I can add everyone to that, or just people who hang out in social and want it. 16:54:04 * vwbusguy- doesn't want to be an op in #Fedora-social 16:54:11 it exists, it is rarely used, normally we send people ther just so they can be kicked, banned, muted... 16:55:08 so, op fedbot, give status to people who hang out there and want it, see if that works out, revisit? Any other proposals? 16:55:29 +1 16:55:36 fair enough 16:55:40 I guess another would be: do nothing and just keep going as we had. ;) 16:55:45 nirik, why not give fedbot access to current fedora-social ops + EvilBob for #Fedora-social ? 16:55:46 is that "all that want it" ? 16:56:03 or should there be a review? 16:56:57 well, It shouldn't be just everyone I would guess, or else it's going to include some of the people we want to police. ;) 16:57:04 * JukeBoxHero votes for EvilBob 16:57:25 nirik, and being selective then could lead to hurt feelings somewhere 16:57:41 so could kicking disruptive people out. ;) 16:57:48 nirik: also can some bans be limited? like a 60 minute max, any others need to be a normal op? 16:57:49 haha 16:58:12 EvilBob, well, fedbot has a ban function that can be indefinite 16:58:22 vwbusguy-: that is why I ask 16:58:25 it's open source so I guess it could be hacked 16:58:33 EvilBob: I don't think there is a way to do that currently. If you have access to doign a kban/ban you can do any size one. 16:58:43 * nirik nods. Someone could patch it. 16:58:55 vwbusguy-: community-ops vs std-ops 16:59:19 community-ops have equal but shorter term power 16:59:38 Jut a thought, we can look at the code 16:59:40 * nirik looks. There is a 'half ops' thing. 17:00:07 that might be useable for this 17:00:19 as far as bans go... Regualr #Fedora-social ops ar ealmost always reachable 17:00:21 we should not take up much more meeting time on this IMO 17:00:49 mether has a topic and not sure what else there is 17:01:00 yeah, doesn't seem a clear consenses... perhaps revisit later. 17:01:24 I don't think it's urgent. 17:01:33 #topic Open Floor 17:01:35 wait till something really blows up, then react :) 17:01:38 take a vote on the concept? 17:01:43 the other #fedora-social regulars don't want a say? 17:01:52 i see many missing.. 17:02:04 JukeBoxHero: ask them to attend next weeks meeting? 17:02:12 and we can revisit there. 17:02:16 JukeBoxHero: most don't want to be involved in "running" the channel 17:02:17 hmm ok will do. 17:02:33 ok, anyone have anything for open floor? mether ? 17:02:41 they just want a place to hang and goof off 17:03:02 yeah, which is what it should be.... 17:03:12 just occasionally drunken ranting happens. ;) 17:03:16 heh 17:03:23 *cough* 17:03:24 mether: take it away 17:03:33 yeah. I just wanted to note the LXDE Fedora Remix I have announced recently is just Fedora 11 GA LXDE packages in a Live CD. no third party packages. so if someone comes for support, do provide help 17:03:34 perhaps we could have a sobriety test. ;) 17:03:57 mether: yeah, excellent. Is there going to be an updated one soon? 17:03:57 JukeBoxHero: most don't want to be involved in "running" the channel <--- true 17:04:08 mether: has that been an issue with someone not supporting it? Don't name names. 17:04:29 EvilBob, no. i am not aware of any issues but since there was some confusion over omega earlier, I just wanted to note this 17:04:40 mether: rock on 17:05:01 you're GREEN :) http://jasonfarrell.com/fedora/fedorasupport/what-does-fedora-support.png 17:05:06 mether, will there be a f11 Omega by chance? 17:05:06 mether: are you keeping abreast with all the spins? 17:05:18 nirik, wickert was very upset with me for not informing him explicitly ahead of time so I dont plan on doing updates but I think he will carry it forward 17:05:47 #info The LXDE remix is stock fedora packages and should be supported by #fedora 17:05:48 vwbusguy-, i am working on it. need to test it a little bit more. should be done by the weekend 17:05:57 EvilBob, yes 17:06:15 mether: would you mind passing this info on to us when ever you can. 17:06:28 nirik, if it is all fedora packages then it is a respin correct 17:06:40 mether: I know I don't have time to track them, and I respect your view on them 17:06:40 jlaska, ping 17:06:42 EvilBob, sure. 17:06:49 Southern_Gentlem: not until it's been approved and gone through the spin process. ;) This one hasn't yet. 17:06:59 Southern_Gentlem, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Remix 17:07:10 ok, anyone have anything further for Open Floor? 17:07:15 mether, if you need another tester, PM or email me :-) 17:07:20 any suggestions/gripes/comments? 17:07:31 jlaska, Got your email - will reply today.... 17:07:41 vwbusguy-, i am upload and drop a PM a while before i send the announcement to confirm. alright? 17:07:42 jlaska, In the mean-time - check this out! http://www.ebizq.net/industrywatch/2261.html 17:07:56 ldimaggi_: wrong channel? 17:07:56 mether, ok 17:08:13 ldimaggi_: let's chat elsewhere ... 17:08:17 ok folks. thanks 17:08:30 jlaska, Oh - the meeting - sorry! 17:08:41 * nirik will close things out soon if there is no more topics 17:08:44 nirik: is there a opinion on the channel hopping abuser from a couple weeks ago 17:08:50 nirik, is there a generic policy on supporting remixs 17:09:14 EvilBob, yeah shhhhh let sleeping dogs lie 17:09:15 EvilBob: not sure. Perhaps after the meeting talk to whoever banned them? 17:09:18 nirik: are the bans still in effect? if so should they be lifted? 17:09:39 mether: well, the closer it is to fedora the more we can help... 17:09:54 nirik: more thinking about general policy on such flagrant abusers 17:09:54 EvilBob: I'm not sure if they are or not. We should check yes. 17:09:59 EvilBob, at this point i want to give that person a couple more weeks 17:11:03 that is all I had, maybe add that to next week's meeting 17:11:14 ok. 17:11:25 * nirik will close the meeting in 60 seconds. 17:12:25 #endmeeting